portrays the beloved detective with exactly the kind of easy charisma and sardonic wit one would expect from him. He succeeded, partially because the star behind one of the world's favorite superheroes took the lead role. Ritchie wanted to add the action he loved to the character's intellect and interweave the two, turning his beloved Sherlock into the action hero he saw in his head. Hollywood is often loath to portray a character as both a capable fighter and an intelligent mind. The visual of Holmes as an armchair detective was often overstated in the earlier on-screen adaptation. He saw many of the old adaptations as inaccurate due to their lack of large-scale action scenes, and sought to rectify the matter. Luckily, Ritchie was a fan of the old books. The classic serials of the 30s and 40s were still the defining cultural image of the detective. Barring a few TV movies, Holmes had been on hiatus from the screen for a strangely long time. In 2009, late of his middling return to form RocknRolla, Ritchie took over Warner Bros.'s new take on Sherlock Holmes, to the shock of many.Īt the time of Guy Ritchie's adaptation, the most recent theatrical Sherlock Holmes film had been released 20 years earlier. Ritchie understands something about the ethos of the criminal underbelly of London that clicks with his audience, and he's certainly made some decent films in the process. Though almost every other film he has ever made received, at best, mixed reception, his fans are numerous and extremely devoted. Ritchie followed it up with 2000s Snatch, solidifying his niche in the gritty crime comedy world. On top of prompting its star's later ascension to fame, the film is a solid and well-loved black comedy with a hard action edge. The film introduced the world to Jason Statham, a phenomenon that has yet to die down even today. Guy Ritchie exploded into the world of gangster cinema in 1998 with his feature debut Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. RELATED: Holmes & Watson Squandered A Great Premise If one were to list every modern director, though, Guy Ritchie would have been one of the last choices to handle the property. Safe in the public domain, Holmes has appeared all over TV and film in a thousand different iterations by a thousand different creators. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories are among the most heavily adapted works in all of literary canon. Guy Ritchie is more so the latter than the former, but he's shocked the world before. Others do one specific thing so well that they become beloved by fans of that subgenre and rarely deviate from their niche. once again.Some directors have a filmography that reads like the greatest hits record, featuring nothing but culture-defining blockbusters one after another. But fans can certainly dream of seeing Rachel McAdams alongside Robert Downey Jr. Whether or not this plot hole will be touched upon in the expanded Sherlock Holmes universe remains to be seen. Also, the fact that she was such an important figure to Holmes and her death was merely glossed over leads viewers to believe they haven't seen the last of Irene Adler. As a woman who had been in this kind of work for an undisclosed amount of time, Irene was a pro who should have had some sort of plan in place should anyone make an attempt on her life, as it came with the territory in this job. Irene Adler was far too important - and intelligent - a character to unceremoniously kill off in the first act of A Game of Shadows. While, at first, viewers could have deduced this as Holmes' final way of letting go of Irene, could it really be that he'd inhaled the scent of wine spilled on the handkerchief at the restaurant where Moriarty and Adler met? Perhaps Sherlock tossing the handkerchief overboard was less of him letting go of her memory and more of a subtle confirmation that Irene was still alive somewhere. In a different scene on a boat to Paris, Holmes takes a deep sniff from Irene's handkerchief before tossing it overboard. When Moriarty gives Holmes Adler's "bloodstained" handkerchief as potential confirmation of her demise, Holmes accepts it without much investigation, possibly overwhelmed by shock and grief. Possibly the most compelling argument that goldstar63 makes is that at one point in the film, Holmes can deduce that a red stain on a drawing by Simza's brother is red wine and not blood.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |